Archive for the ‘compatibilism’ Category

Rob Bell’s theological blunders

April 29, 2011

Bell seems unaware that theologians of various traditions have talked about the two sides of God’s will (or two lenses through which God views the world). To be sure, there is mystery here, but it’s common to distinguish between God’s will of decree, whereby everything that he wills comes to pass (Eph. 1:11), and his will of desire which can be rejected (Matt. 7:21). And yet one of Bell’s main planks in support of universal reconciliation is that if God wants all people to be saved, then all people must eventually be saved. “How great is God?” Bell asks. “Great enough to achieve what God sets out to do, or kind of great, great most of the time, but in this, the fate of billions of people, not totally great. Sort of great. A little great” (97–99). The strong insinuation is that a God who does not save everyone is not totally great.

Kevin DeYoung, God Is Still Holy and What You Learned in Sunday School Is Still True: A Review of “Love Wins

At times, Bell ounds like a consistent Arminian who so values libertarian free will that man gets want he wants – even after death. The failure to observe two senses of the ‘will of God’ is of a piece with this tendency.

Advertisements

God’s Sovereignty, our responsibility

August 22, 2009

…our choices fall within the order of the causes which is known for certain to God and is contained in His foreknowledge–for, human choices are the causes of human acts. It follows that He who foreknew the causes of all things could not be unaware that our choices were among those causes which were foreknown as the causes of our acts.

St. Augustine, The City of God, (ed.) Bourke, New York, 1958, p.106-7, in Paul Helm, The Providence of God, IVP, 1993, p.23

Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility

August 7, 2009

Spurgeon was once asked how he reconciled divine sovereignty and human responsibility. His response: “There is no need to reconcile friends”